💌 Feedback Gallery

Reviews and feedback that salamander has received from the puzzle community

hi19hi19

3 years ago

Miniwhirl

Good false paths for its size.

VisD

3 years ago

Actuary

~15 tries. It's not super hard, but it's very easy to lose moves doing silly things and the concept is just cool as hell. This level holds up in terms of fun and uniqueness over the years imo.

davidspencer6174

8 years ago

Casserole

Really cool final solution, not obvious at all that it would be shorter.

Tilu

9 years ago

Mandrake

Got it! Had a 2 off, however simple. My main problem was breaking through at very beginning. It even demotivated me from working out the board. Once I achieved to start, it was fast. Did love it.

yokosooo

10 years ago

Mandrake

I am another one who had a 2-off. That mistake is really so silly ^u^, otherwise will be able to finish this level much earlier. This level is really a perfect construction.

Tilu

10 years ago

Velvet

I liked that one very much. I went from 7 off to winning. I was loosing steps stupidely, close after beginning, because opening a lock that was no lock at all... Typical I would say! LOL

ybbun

11 years ago

Mandrake

Fun! But I didn't really see any tricks, just a couple of minor optimizations. That's OK though, it's interesting when the challenge comes from figuring out how you even get to the end!

alazeh

12 years ago

Mandrake

I am very sure that I've already solved this level, lately, in some other (private) world. It's a great level! 79 tries for me, here. And had a 2 off, too, but it was a really silly ''going around something''. :)

alazeh

13 years ago

Archipelago

Wow, this is one GREAT level. Took me a looooong time to come even ''near'' (which was 16 off). Then in 117 try I came 2 off and the next try I got it! :)

davidspencer6174

13 years ago

Dividers

Quite frankly I didn't notice the worse path until after I had won. The slower way seems better disguised to me, but maybe others find it different.

← Previous

25 of 44